Sunday, July 15, 2012

2012 Summer Sectional

Final Results are in!

Section 1

1 ZIMMERMANN, TROY  WI 1970*  2031*  L2 W3 X4 W2 W3 X1  5.0
2 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM WI 2222*  2223*  W1 W4 D3 L1 X4 W3  4.5
3 COOPER, JEFF      WI 2200*  2200*  L4 L1 D2 X4 L1 L2  1.5
4 CARDENAS, DAVID R WI 1982*  1992*  W3 L2 F1 F3 F2 F4  1.0








Section 2






1 COONS, JAMES JAY  WI 1863*  1843*  W4 D3 W2 D4 L3 L2  3.0
 2 KRAUSE, AARON P  WI 1786*  1781*  W3 W4 L1 L3 L4 W1  3.0
3 SHI, TINGLIN      WI 1819*  1823*  L2 D1 U0 W2 W1 D4  3.0
4 WAINSCOTT, CHRIS  WI 1560*  1605*  L1 L2 U0 D1 W2 D3  2.0








Section 3






1 HUANG, ALENA      WI 1507*  1547*  D2 W3 W4 W2 L3 W4  4.5
2 KULKARNI, PRANAV  WI 1451*  1508*  D1 W4 W3 L1 U0 W3  3.5
 3 LAWRENCE, MICHAEL WI 1432*  1431*  W4 L1 L2 U0 W1 L2  2.0
 4 REESE SR, GREGORY WI 1469*  1409*  L3 L2 L1 U0 U0 L1  0.0








Section 4






1 HUANG, SABRINA    WI 1233*  1242*  D2 W4 W3 D2 W4 W3  5.0
2 VOOTKUR, SRIKAR  WI 1041*  1124*  D1 W3 W4 D1 D3 W4  4.5
3 LANDEY, CHARLES N WI  949*    924*  W4 L2 L1 L4 D2 L1  1.5
4 KLASS, RALPH F    WI  905*    876*  L3 L1 L2 W3 L1 L2  1.0

13 comments:

  1. Too manny sectional tournaments. We need just normal swiss tournaments. That means nobody can join for 8 weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No its 6 weeks. There's 4 people in a section and you play each person two times. 3 X 2 = 6.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Either Saturday or Sunday I'll update the standings. I don't have the results with me now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jeez really lousy with the updates...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Still no updates?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry for not updating. I usually get emails about results but I haven't gotten anything lately. Also I don't go to the club any more because I'm working 2nd shift. I have plenty of time to update this blog but I need to be given the results before I can post them up here. I hope I can get results up here soon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Finally I got updates! I'll try to keep up from now on.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Congrats to Troy Zimmermann on becoming an expert!

    ReplyDelete
  9. why was this even rated twice?

    ReplyDelete
  10. yes. strange. why was section 1 rated twice?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Because the players in the section 1 are extra special! J/K, I'll let the tournament director know about it and fix it.


    Ben

    ReplyDelete